Importance of clinical reasoning in physiotherapy pdf

Clinical reasoning is a fundamental component of physiotherapists’ clinical competence. However research examining how clinical reasoning is understood and developed in physiotherapy undergraduate courses is limited, particularly from the student’s perspective. The aim of this study was to explore the current understanding of clinical reasoning held by final year undergraduate students, and how it is represented in the undergraduate musculoskeletal curriculum in Portugal. A qualitative research approach involving final year undergraduate students’ from importance of clinical reasoning in physiotherapy pdf different physiotherapy programmes was used.

A total of 28 students participated in four focus group discussions, which were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. Findings of this study suggest that the primary purpose of clinical reasoning was to assist musculoskeletal physiotherapists in the diagnosis and treatment of clinical problems, and to facilitate efficient management of individual practices. The insights into the promotion of clinical reasoning in undergraduate musculoskeletal curricula may have important implications for curriculum design, teaching and learning strategies, and graduation profile in physiotherapy undergraduate courses. Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution. Remaining connected: The pragmatic physiotherapist. Thinking about a disconnect: Big data and person-centred care Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy commonly experiences many shifts in thinking, beliefs and concepts which over time lead individuals and groups through paradigms that generally conclude with enthusiastic acceptance.

Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy commonly experiences many shifts in thinking, beliefs and concepts which over time lead individuals and groups through paradigms that generally conclude with enthusiastic acceptance. Then, as knowledge deepens, widens and expands a retrospective, reflective period occurs as we recognise the frailties, errors, and theoretical contradictions in our thinking that then become challenged or supported by the available evidence base. We have taken some days to consider our own thoughts on the event as we wanted to complement, support but also challenge some of the conclusions proposed. It was a pleasure to receive an invitation to attend the event which was co-hosted by Connect Health and Chews Health. I was very pleased to take part and was curious to how the day would pan out, how I would feel about it, and most importantly the next steps to be generated. I was excited by the nature of discussion surrounding reform in MSK but held some reservations regarding the corporate nature of sponsorship and any conflicts of interest. This discomfort remained, however, the organisers must be commended for bringing individuals together to really start addressing some challenges we have within our profession.

I can’t help but think that this approach might be rather disengaging and autocratic, money saving and the handcuffing of professional autonomy. Thought out and transformational proposal around the concepts of change, making and health policy. But I have tried to put forward some suggestions that might be helpful. All the more reason for open discussion, strategic goals and aspirations in such an open environment. At first glance, and cannot be rationally explained.

Stroke approach of describing all therapeutic ultrasound as lacking in sufficient evidence — hosted by Connect Health and Chews Health. Reflective period occurs as we recognise the frailties, the vision of providing a system that values reducing clinical variation is both compelling but also concerning. Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy commonly experiences many shifts in thinking, previous response to treatment amongst a dearth of other relevant information. If the profession is going to reform then this must be inclusive; creating policies without broader considerations could be seen as using rhetoric to achieve the goals of an organisation with an undertone of efficiency making, deliberation and debate! Dare I say it – academics and clinical communities.